Marshall v. Marshall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Marshall v. Marshall

283 A.D. 970, 130 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5953

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 24, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D. 970 (Marshall v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marshall v. Marshall, 283 A.D. 970, 130 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to modify a judgment of separation by reducing the amount awarded for support of the plaintiff and an infant child. Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, the motion granted, without costs, and the allowance for support of the plaintiff reduced to $85 a month commencing August 1, 1953. The daughter is no [971]*971longer an infant and is self-supporting. Obviously, the denial of the motion was based on miscalculations both as to the increase in the net salary of the defendant and what he would have left if he was obliged to continue payment of the amount directed by the judgment. Nolan, P. J., Adel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to modify a judgment of separation by reducing the amount awarded for support of the plaintiff and an infant child. Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, the motion granted, without costs, and the allowance for support of the plaintiff reduced to $85 a month commencing August 1, 1953. The daughter is no [971]*971longer an infant and is self-supporting. Obviously, the denial of the motion was based on miscalculations both as to the increase in the net salary of the defendant and what he would have left if he was obliged to continue payment of the amount directed by the judgment. Nolan, P. J., Adel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D. 970, 130 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-marshall-nyappdiv-1954.