Marshall v. Marshall

379 So. 2d 998, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15914
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Marshall v. Marshall. Read the opinion of the Court — 386 So. 2d 11
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 5, 1980·No. Nos. 79-893, 79-894 and 79-1071·Published

Opinion

BARKDULL, Judge.

This cause occurs before us seeking review of three orders: finding the appellant in contempt for failure to comply with a prior order of the court dated October 3, 1978, relating to child support; an order denying a motion to vacate said order; and an award of attorney’s fees.

We affirm the latter two orders, the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error in their entry. We reverse the order of October 5, 1978 because of the failure of the trial judge to make a finding of the willful refusal of the appellant to comply with the prior order of support. See: Murphy v. Murphy, 370 So.2d 403 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

This matter will be returned to the trial judge to reconsider this matter to make a specific finding on this point. In this connection, he can either do it on the record as already made or he may take additional evidence as he may be so advised.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall v. Marshall, 379 So. 2d 998, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15914 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

379 So. 2d 998 (Marshall v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Murphy
370 So. 2d 403 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)