Marshall v. Lappin

456 F. App'x 242
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 29, 2011·No. No. 11-6288·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

La’Ron Marshall appeals the district court’s orders: accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971); and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marshall v. Lappin, No. 2:10-cv-00003-JPB-DJJ, 2010 WL 5418929 (N.D. W. Va. Dec. 23, 2010); (Feb. 2, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall v. Lappin, 456 F. App'x 242 (4th Cir. 2011).

456 F. App'x 242 (Marshall v. Lappin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related