Marshall v. Kansas City So Rwy

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 24, 2002
Docket01-60275
StatusUnpublished

This text of Marshall v. Kansas City So Rwy (Marshall v. Kansas City So Rwy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marshall v. Kansas City So Rwy, (5th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-60275

MERLEAN MARSHALL; ET AL., Plaintiffs,

MERLEAN MARSHALL, individually and on behalf of all wrongful death beneficiaries of Lucy R. Shepard, deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY; ERIC W. ROBINSON; ROBERT E. EVERETT; C.L. DUETT,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Mississippi 3:99-CV-433

June 20, 2002

Before DAVIS, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mozley

v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). In this civil rights case, the plaintiff filed a notice of

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. appeal from an order entered by the district court on March 30, 2000, dismissing his claims against

defendants Robert E. Everett, C. L. Duett and Eric W. Robinson. The plaintiff’s claims against

Kansas City Southern Railway Company remain to be adjudicated.

When an action involves multiple parties or multiple claims, any decision that adjudicates the

liability of fewer than all the parties or disposes of fewer than all the claims does not terminate the

litigation and is therefore not appealable unless certified by the district court under Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b). See Thompson v. Betts, 754 F.2d 1243, 1245 (5th Cir. 1985); Borne v. A & P Boat Rentals

Nos. 4, Inc., 755 F.2d 1131, 1133 (5th Cir. 1985). The district court has not certified the order for

appeal. Accordingly, this court is without jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wordy Jack Thompson, Jr. v. Judge Charles O. Betts
754 F.2d 1243 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)
Claude Borne v. A & P Boat Rentals No. 4, Inc.
755 F.2d 1131 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)
Marion Ray Mosley v. Officer M.D. Cozby
813 F.2d 659 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Marshall v. Kansas City So Rwy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-kansas-city-so-rwy-ca5-2002.