Marshall v. Harvey

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 26, 2007·No. 07-1186·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1186

PAMELA MARSHALL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOCTOR FRANCIS J. HARVEY; LTC WILLIAM LUKENS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:06-cv-01160-LMB)

Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: July 26, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pamela Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Larry Lee Gregg, Assistant United States Attorney, Kevin Jason Mikolashek, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Pamela Marshall appeals the district court’s order

granting her former federal employer’s motion for summary judgment

as to her petition for review of the Merit System Protection

Board’s decision and on her employment discrimination claim. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Marshall v. Harvey, No. 1:06-cv-01160-LMB (E.D. Va. Feb. 9,

2007; filed Feb. 15, 2007 & entered Feb. 16, 2007). We deny

Marshall’s motion to expedite as moot and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall v. Harvey, (4th Cir. 2007).

Marshall v. Harvey (Marshall v. Harvey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.