Marshall v. Hare

378 U.S. 561, 84 S. Ct. 1912, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1036, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 847
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 22, 1964
Docket962
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 378 U.S. 561 (Marshall v. Hare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marshall v. Hare, 378 U.S. 561, 84 S. Ct. 1912, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1036, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 847 (1964).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment below is reversed. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533; Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado, 377 U. S. 713. The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views stated in our opinions in Reynolds v. Sims and in the other cases relating to state legislative apportionment decided along with Reynolds.

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Stewart would affirm the judgment because the Michigan system of legislative apportionment is clearly a rational one and clearly does not frustrate effective majority rule. Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 589.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of State
921 N.W.2d 247 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2018)
Larios v. Cox
300 F. Supp. 2d 1320 (N.D. Georgia, 2004)
Spivey v. State of Ohio
999 F. Supp. 987 (N.D. Ohio, 1998)
In Re Apportionment, State Legislature-1992
486 N.W.2d 639 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1992)
Neff v. Secretary of State
439 Mich. 715 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1992)
In Re Apportionment of State Legislature—1982
321 N.W.2d 565 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1982)
Sailors v. Board of Ed. of Kent Cty.
387 U.S. 105 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Butcher v. Bloom
216 A.2d 457 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1966)
Silver v. Jordan
241 F. Supp. 576 (S.D. California, 1965)
Honsey v. Donovan
236 F. Supp. 8 (D. Minnesota, 1964)
League of Nebraska Municipalities v. Marsh
232 F. Supp. 411 (D. Nebraska, 1964)
In Re Apportionment of State Legislature-1964
128 N.W.2d 722 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
378 U.S. 561, 84 S. Ct. 1912, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1036, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-hare-scotus-1964.