Marshall v. Ethicon, Inc.
This text of 670 F. App'x 775 (Marshall v. Ethicon, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jennifer D. and David C. Marshall appeal the district court’s orders dismissing this action for failure to effect timely service of process and denying their motion [776]*776for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marshall v. Ethicon, Inc., Nos. 2:12-cv-02809, 2:12-md-92327 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 26 & May 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
670 F. App'x 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-ethicon-inc-ca4-2016.