Marshall v. Crane
This text of 162 N.E.2d 669 (Marshall v. Crane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Exceptions overruled. This is an action of tort for personal injuries allegedly received in a motor accident. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant. The only exception is to the denial of the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. There was no abuse of discretion. Haines Corp. v. Winthrop Square Cafe, Inc. 335 Mass. 152, 154. Statkus v. Metropolitan Transit Authy. 335 Mass. 172, 174. The plaintiff’s brief is in violation of Rule 15 of the Rules for the Regulation of Practice before the Full Court (1952), as amended, 337 Mass. 818-819, in that there is no reference by pages to the record in stating alleged facts and alleged previous proceedings. The plaintiff’s brief is struck from the files of the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 N.E.2d 669, 339 Mass. 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-crane-mass-1959.