Marshall v. Compher

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2008·No. 08-1342·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1342

MARIAN MARSHALL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GARY COMPHER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:07-cv- 02394-AMD)

Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 4, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marian Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Joseph O’Brien, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Marian Marshall appeals the district court’s order

granting Gary Compher’s motion to dismiss. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Marshall v. Compher, No.

1:07-cv-02394-AMD (D. Md. Mar. 3, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall v. Compher, (4th Cir. 2008).

Marshall v. Compher (Marshall v. Compher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.