Marshall v. Compher
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1342
MARIAN MARSHALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GARY COMPHER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:07-cv- 02394-AMD)
Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 4, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marian Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Joseph O’Brien, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Marian Marshall appeals the district court’s order
granting Gary Compher’s motion to dismiss. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Marshall v. Compher, No.
1:07-cv-02394-AMD (D. Md. Mar. 3, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marshall v. Compher (Marshall v. Compher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.