Marshall v. Colvert
This text of 27 Am. Dec. 589 (Marshall v. Colvert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was only in a court of equity, that the claim of Marshall could be adjusted. He claimed indemnity against his suretyship for Colvert; and as no fraud in the deed of trust is proved or alleged, that deed gave him priority over the executions. The only creditor, who answered the bill, claimed priority to any of the other creditors, out of the surplus after the purposes of the deed of trust were satisfied. An account ought to have been taken, the amount of the responsibility of Marshall for Colvert ascer[149]*149tained, and the surplus, if any, applied to the payment of the executions, according to the priority they gave to the proceeds of the property. The decree is reversed, the injunction reinstated, and the cause remanded for further proceed-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 Am. Dec. 589, 5 Va. 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-colvert-va-1834.