Marshall v. Brucker
243 F.2d 834, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 256
This text of 243 F.2d 834 (Marshall v. Brucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Marshall v. Brucker, 243 F.2d 834, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 256 (D.C. Cir. 1957).
Opinion
We are agreed that Harmon v. Brucker, 1957, 100 U.S.App.D.C. -•, 243 F.2d 613, is controlling here. If the question were open, Judge Bazelon would reverse for the reasons stated in his dissent in Harmon and Judge Fahy would wish to consider the question anew.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
John H. Harmon, III v. Wilber M. Brucker, Individually and as Secretary of the Department of the Army
243 F.2d 613 (D.C. Circuit, 1957)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
243 F.2d 834, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-brucker-cadc-1957.