Marshall v. Bishop

Fourth Circuit

Marshall v. Bishop

490 F. App'x 590

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 28, 2012·No. No. 12-7074·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Marshall appeals the district court’s order denying his request for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Marshall v. Bishop, No. 8:12-cv-00985-RWT (D.Md. May 31, 2012). The motions for “emergency declaration for entry of default judgment” and for leave to proceed under the Prison Litigation Reform Act without prepayment of fees are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Marshall appeals the district court’s order denying his request for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Marshall v. Bishop, No. 8:12-cv-00985-RWT (D.Md. May 31, 2012). The motions for “emergency declaration for entry of default judgment” and for leave to proceed under the Prison Litigation Reform Act without prepayment of fees are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Marshall v. Bishop, 490 F. App'x 590 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

490 F. App'x 590 (Marshall v. Bishop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.