Marshall v. Balletti

761 So. 2d 490, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8254, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 610
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 5, 2000
DocketNo. 3D99-685
StatusPublished

This text of 761 So. 2d 490 (Marshall v. Balletti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marshall v. Balletti, 761 So. 2d 490, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8254, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 610 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Although the damages amount to a large sum of money, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the verdict to stand. It is reasonable considering David Balletti’s age, the reasonable probability his injury will lead to embarrassment as he reaches adolescence, and other evidence presented at trial. The amount is not “flagrantly outrageous and extravagant” or “beyond all measure.” See Pierard v. Aerospatiale Helicopter Corp., 689 So.2d 1099, 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). See also Bould v. Touchette, 349 So.2d 1181 (Fla.1977).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bould v. Touchette
349 So. 2d 1181 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Pierard v. Aerospatiale Helicopter Corp.
689 So. 2d 1099 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
761 So. 2d 490, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8254, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-balletti-fladistctapp-2000.