Marshall v. Ball

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Marshall v. Ball

2 Del. Cas. 455, 1818 Del. LEXIS 53

DecidedAugust 26, 1818

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Del. Cas. 455 (Marshall v. Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marshall v. Ball, 2 Del. Cas. 455, 1818 Del. LEXIS 53 (Del. Ct. App. 1818).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The right of the party should be established at law, and the precise place ascertained, upon which a writ of injunction might be fixed, so as to protect the party from any wrong. This has not been done, and indeed there is no proof that any timber or stones have been taken from the condemned land, nor any threats or danger that such will be the case. The complainants had an opportunity to try their rights at law; they neglected to do so. The bill must be dismissed with costs to defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor.

The right of the party should be established at law, and the precise place ascertained, upon which a writ of injunction might be fixed, so as to protect the party from any wrong. This has not been done, and indeed there is no proof that any timber or stones have been taken from the condemned land, nor any threats or danger that such will be the case. The complainants had an opportunity to try their rights at law; they neglected to do so. The bill must be dismissed with costs to defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Del. Cas. 455, 1818 Del. LEXIS 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-ball-delch-1818.