Marshall v. Babson Institute
This text of 356 Mass. 737 (Marshall v. Babson Institute) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this action of contract a judge sitting without jury found for the defendants. The case is here on a bill of exceptions of the plaintiff which recites that there was also filed a “Claim of Exceptions.” However, the bill does not disclose that the plaintiff took a single exception to any “opinion, ruling, direction or judgment of the . . . [judge] rendered upon any matter of law.” G. L. c. 231, § 113. That the judge allowed a bill of exceptions does not “put life into exceptions which never existed.” Herrick v. Waitt, 224 Mass. 415, 417. Commonwealth v. MacGregor, 319 Mass. 462, 463. No question of law has been brought to this court.
Bill of exceptions dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
356 Mass. 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-babson-institute-mass-1970.