Marshall v. Angel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Marshall v. Angel

447 So. 2d 346, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11983

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 1, 1984

DocketNo. 83-1745

StatusPublished

This text of 447 So. 2d 346 (Marshall v. Angel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marshall v. Angel, 447 So. 2d 346, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11983 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners, Marion County and John Marshall, seek a writ of prohibition. Be[347]*347cause we find that the trial court had jurisdiction over the subject matter of the cause below, we deem prohibition to be an improper remedy. See Moore v. Leisure Pool Service, Inc., 412 So.2d 392 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); School Board of Marion County v. Angel, 404 So.2d 359 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

Certiorari review pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(2)(A), which might otherwise have been available, is precluded here due to petitioners’ failure to comply with the thirty-day requirement of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(c).

Accordingly, the Petition for Writ of Prohibition is

DENIED.

DAUKSCH, COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI