Marshall v. . Allen

1 N.C. 690
Court of King's Bench·Decided July 5, 1793·Published

Opinions

I take two exceptions in this case. (1) He cannot plead ancient Demesneafter imparlance; this was adjudged in 4 Jac. inter Clark and Hampton, in this court. I was of counsel in the case and the plea of ancient demesne was disallowed after imparlance. (2) The plea concludes to the action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall v. . Allen, 1 N.C. 690 (kingsbench 1793).

1 N.C. 690 (Marshall v. . Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kleinschmidt v. American Mining Co.
139 P. 785 (Montana Supreme Court, 1914)