Marshall Spiegel

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois·Decided June 3, 2024·No. 20-21625·Unknown

Opinion

!"#$%&'($)$%('*)"+,!-$./'.0!,$' "0,$1%,"'&#($,#.$'02'#33#"0#(' %)($%,"'#(#0"' ' ! F' ' #5'678'' F' .:;7'"DE'GHBIGJKGL' ' F' ' 9:6;<:=='(>?7@7=A' F' .<:>C76'JJ' ' F' ' '''' &7BCD6E' F' MNO@7'$?PDC75;7'75C6?7;'<:_7'B775'N5O76=?57O'CD'67`=7]C'O?;:==Da:5]7'?5'a:6CE''$<7'B:;?;'`D6'7:]<'O?;:==Da:5]7'?;'67`=7]C7O'BQ'5NP76?]:='5DC:C?D5;'C<:C':>>7:6'D5'C<7'=7`C' D`'7:]<'N5O76=?57O'75C6QE''$<7'5NP76?]:='5DC:C?D5;']D667;>D5O'CD'C<7'75NP76:C7O'>:6:@6:><;'B7=DaE!! ' bJF' 3NP>?5@'c'$0$)3'D`'O?;:==Da7O':PDN5C;'bJHd'D`':``7]C7O'75C6?7;F8'W'ZAGKXE[H' ! ! $<7'.DN6C'P:Q'?P>D;7':'C75'>76]75C'>75:=CQ'D5'75C6?7;'C<:C':>>7:6'CD'B7'e=NP>?5@Ef''$<7' .DN6C'a?=='67ON]7'7:]<'75C6Q'P:6I7O':;';N]<'>76'C<7'>75:=CQE''!"#$%#&'()*+"A'\G'*E,E'\HHA'\H['b*:5I6E' "E&E'#==E'J[Y\F'b(]>=?]:5C;'P:Q'5DC']?6]NP_75C'C<7'P?5?PNP'C?P7'67gN?67P75C'D6' :5Q'D`'C<7'67gN?67P75C;'D`'O7C:?='BQ'e=NP>?5@f':'BN5]<'D`':]C?_?C?7;'?5CD':';?5@=7'75C6QE''h]?C:C?D5' DP?CC7OiE''%:]<'CQ>7'D`';76_?]7';D5O?5@';>7]?`?]'C?P7':==DCP75CEfFE''' ' $<7']DN6C'<:;'?O75C?`?7O'`D6CQjD57'C?P7'75C6?7;'a?5@E''$<7;7' 75C6?7;'67gN7;C7O':'CDC:=':PDN5C'D`'W'ZGAKX[EHH':5OA'?5'=?@?5@A'C<:C':PDN5C'a?=='B7' 67ON]7O'BQ'W'ZAGKXE[H'hJHdiE! ' bGF' &7`75O?5@'277')>>=?]:C?D5'c'$0$)3'D`'O?;:==Da7O':PDN5C;8'W'XJELH' ! ' $<7']DN6C'6N=7O':C'C<7'17:6?5@'C<:C'C?P7';>75C'O7`75O?5@'C<7'`77':>>=?]:C?D5A';>7]?`?]:==QA' C?P7';>75C'D5'C<7';N>>=7P75C:='B6?7`?5@'D6O767O'BQ'C<7']DN6C'?;'O?;:==Da7OE!'');'C<7']DN6C';C:C7O':C' ! !!! "#!$%#&%'(!)*!+,+-*!./0!12&'.!2'30'03!456.7!827!99:;!<&==>0?0#.%>!@'A0BA#C!2#!./0!A<<&0!2B!<.%#3A#C!'%A<03!A#! ./0!D0=>(!A#!E&==2'.!2B!F/A'3!G#.0'A?!H00!I==>A1%.A2#!2B!I30>?%#!J!K0..>0?%#*!L.37!B2'!I>>2M%#10!%#3!N%(?0#.!2B! G#.0'A?!O2?=0#<%.A2#!%#3!D0A?@&'<0?0#.!2B!PQ=0#<0!.2!./0!"BBA1A%>!O2??A..00!2B!R#<01&'03!O'03A.2'158(d). In re Firstmark Corp., 46 F3d 653, 658-60 (7th Cir. 1995) (order allowing payment of counsel is interlocutory because it does not affect any substantive rights, a motion to determine fees can only be brought as part of a larger case and the court can reexamine interim compensation awards throughout the case until it makes a final decision with respect to compensation). ‘This award of compensation constitutes an interim allowance only and is not therefore a final, appealable order. All objections in relation to the request are preserved for later determination.

Dated: June 3, 2024 ~_S- — ‘Timothy A. Barnes, Judge United States Bankruptcy Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall Spiegel, (Ill. 2024).

Marshall Spiegel (Marshall Spiegel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related