Marshall Spiegel

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois·Decided June 3, 2024·No. 20-21625·Unknown

Opinion

!"#$%&'($)$%('*)"+,!-$./'.0!,$' "0,$1%,"'&#($,#.$'02'#33#"0#(' %)($%,"'#(#0"' ' ! F' ' #5'678'' F' .:;7'"DE'GHBIGJKGL' ' F' ' 9:6;<:=='(>?7@7=A' F' .<:>C76'JJ' ' F' ' '''' &7BCD6E' F' MNO@7'$?PDC75;7'75C6?7;'<:_7'B775'N5O76=?57O'CD'67`=7]C'O?;:==Da:5]7'?5'a:6CE''$<7'B:;?;'`D6'7:]<'O?;:==Da:5]7'?;'67`=7]C7O'BQ'5NP76?]:='5DC:C?D5;'C<:C':>>7:6'D5'C<7'=7`C' D`'7:]<'N5O76=?57O'75C6QE''$<7'5NP76?]:='5DC:C?D5;']D667;>D5O'CD'C<7'75NP76:C7O'>:6:@6:><;'B7=DaE!! ' bJF' 3NP>?5@'c'$0$)3'D`'O?;:==Da7O':PDN5C;'bJHd'D`':``7]C7O'75C6?7;F8'W'ZAGKXE[H' ! ! $<7'.DN6C'P:Q'?P>D;7':'C75'>76]75C'>75:=CQ'D5'75C6?7;'C<:C':>>7:6'CD'B7'e=NP>?5@Ef''$<7' .DN6C'a?=='67ON]7'7:]<'75C6Q'P:6I7O':;';N]<'>76'C<7'>75:=CQE''!"#$%#&'()*+"A'\G'*E,E'\HHA'\H['b*:5I6E' "E&E'#==E'J[Y\F'b(]>=?]:5C;'P:Q'5DC']?6]NP_75C'C<7'P?5?PNP'C?P7'67gN?67P75C'D6' :5Q'D`'C<7'67gN?67P75C;'D`'O7C:?='BQ'e=NP>?5@f':'BN5]<'D`':]C?_?C?7;'?5CD':';?5@=7'75C6QE''h]?C:C?D5' DP?CC7OiE''%:]<'CQ>7'D`';76_?]7';D5O?5@';>7]?`?]'C?P7':==DCP75CEfFE''' ' $<7']DN6C'<:;'?O75C?`?7O'`D6CQjD57'C?P7'75C6?7;'a?5@E''$<7;7' 75C6?7;'67gN7;C7O':'CDC:=':PDN5C'D`'W'ZGAKX[EHH':5OA'?5'=?@?5@A'C<:C':PDN5C'a?=='B7' 67ON]7O'BQ'W'ZAGKXE[H'hJHdiE! ' bGF' &7`75O?5@'277')>>=?]:C?D5'c'$0$)3'D`'O?;:==Da7O':PDN5C;8'W'XJELH' ! ' $<7']DN6C'6N=7O':C'C<7'17:6?5@'C<:C'C?P7';>75C'O7`75O?5@'C<7'`77':>>=?]:C?D5A';>7]?`?]:==QA' C?P7';>75C'D5'C<7';N>>=7P75C:='B6?7`?5@'D6O767O'BQ'C<7']DN6C'?;'O?;:==Da7OE!'');'C<7']DN6C';C:C7O':C' ! !!! "#!$%#&%'(!)*!+,+-*!./0!12&'.!2'30'03!456.7!827!99:;!<&==>0?0#.%>!@'A0BA#C!2#!./0!A<<&0!2B!<.%#3A#C!'%A<03!A#! ./0!D0=>(!A#!E&==2'.!2B!F/A'3!G#.0'A?!H00!I==>A1%.A2#!2B!I30>?%#!J!K0..>0?%#*!L.37!B2'!I>>2M%#10!%#3!N%(?0#.!2B! G#.0'A?!O2?=0#<%.A2#!%#3!D0A?@&'<0?0#.!2B!PQ=0#<0!.2!./0!"BBA1A%>!O2??A..00!2B!R#<01&'03!O'03A.2'158(d). In re Firstmark Corp., 46 F3d 653, 658-60 (7th Cir. 1995) (order allowing payment of counsel is interlocutory because it does not affect any substantive rights, a motion to determine fees can only be brought as part of a larger case and the court can reexamine interim compensation awards throughout the case until it makes a final decision with respect to compensation). ‘This award of compensation constitutes an interim allowance only and is not therefore a final, appealable order. All objections in relation to the request are preserved for later determination.

Dated: June 3, 2024 ~_S- — ‘Timothy A. Barnes, Judge United States Bankruptcy Court

EXHIBIT A 09/19/23 HLA Email exchange with M. Desmond, counsel to debtor, regarding motion for 0.30 hrs appointment of trustee, chapter 11 case, and upcoming meeting; send papers of (1)Lumping settlement offers send pleadings. 09/19/23 NRD Confer with HLA re his correspondence with M. Desmond on potential 0.40 hrs resolution to case; thereafter locate and forward settlement letters as requested. 09/20/23 HLA Preparation for and participation in conference with M. Desmond, co-counsel 1.40 hrs to debtor, regarding history of case, settlement efforts, motion to convert, motion to appoint trustee, ratification of improprieties, and resolution. 09/20/23 HLA Review, analyze and respond to emails relating to UST's motion to appoint 0.20 hrs trustee, and briefing schedules. 09/20/23 NRD Preparation for and attendance at hearing relating to two motions both (1) 1.60 hrs concerning ReadyCap transaction. 09/20/23 NRD Telephone conference with G. Silver re reactions to hearing, comparison of 0.40 hrs notes, government shutdown risk, and handling of briefing. 09/20/23 NRD Confer with HLA re debrief from hearing and bringing him up to speed. 0.20 hrs 09/20/23 NRD Exchange emails with HLA regarding requests from M. Desmond. 0.10 hrs 09/21/23 NRD Review of emails from UST serving motion for chapter 11 trustee on lender 0.10 hrs and mortgage broker. 09/26/23 NRD Telephone conference with N. Rugg re approach to hearing tomorrow on new 0.40 hrs motion to disband Committee. 09/27/23 HLA Attendance at office conference with NRD regarding outcome of hearing on 0.30 hrs motion to reconstitute the committee, findings of fact and conclusions of law relating to Matthew Spiegel's claim, discovery on motion to convert, and likely revised plan. 09/27/23 NRD Preparation for and appearance at hearing in case, primarily on 1.90 hrs (1) Matthew/Debtor's new motion to disband, which was withdrawn, then including discussion of Debtor's new plan and confirmation process; argue Committee's position where appropriate. 09/27/23 NRD Confer with HLA re debrief from hearing, explaining good result. 0.10 hrs 09/27/23 NRD Draft email to counsel to Insurance company providing summary of hearing. 0.10 hrs 09/28/23 NRD Telephone conference with G. Silver re reaction to hearing yesterday and path 0.40 hrs forward. 10/02/23 NRD Confer with HLA re tasks for week in case, briefing deadlines, and approach 0.20 hrs to discovery. 10/02/23 NRD Review and analysis of Debtor's motion for retroactive 363 relief, flagging 0.50 hrs issues in margins, and generally brainstorming response to same. 10/02/23 NRD Conduct legal research in connection with 363 motion, specifically pulling 0.80 hrs cases cited therein and distinguishing for response. 10/02/23 NRD Commence general outlining of response to Debtor's 363 motion. 0.60 hrs 10/03/23 NRD Commence drafting response to Debtor's motion for retroactive 363 relief. 2.70 hrs 10/04/23 NRD Telephone conference in the morning with N. Rugg regarding approach to 0.10 hrs hearing. 10/04/23 NRD Telephone conference with G. Silver regarding approach to hearing. 0.30 hrs 10/04/23 NRD Appear and participate in hearing in case on numerous issues, including plan 1.80 hrs balloting procedures and initial presentment of fee application. 10/05/23 NRD Continue work on drafting response to Debtor's 363 motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall Spiegel, (Ill. 2024).

Marshall Spiegel (Marshall Spiegel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related