Marshall Ray Corp. v. C. Haedke & Co.
212 N.E.2d 771, 16 N.Y.2d 967, 265 N.Y.S.2d 284, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1045
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marshall Ray Corp. v. C. Haedke & Co., 212 N.E.2d 771, 16 N.Y.2d 967, 265 N.Y.S.2d 284, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1045 (N.Y. 1965).
212 N.E.2d 771 (Marshall Ray Corp. v. C. Haedke & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Heimlich v. Charlton Lithographing, Inc.
103 Misc. 2d 741 (New York Supreme Court, 1979)