Marshall Martinez v. Harold Falk
This text of 5 F.3d 537 (Marshall Martinez v. Harold Falk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
5 F.3d 537
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Marshall MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
Harold FALK, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 92-16976.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 13, 1993.*
Decided Aug. 19, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii; No. CV-89-00770-ACK, Alan C. Kay, District Judge, Presiding.
D.Hawaii
AFFIRMED.
Before: SNEED, POOLE and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
This court has carefully considered the record in this case and the briefs of the parties. For the reasons given by Magistrate Judge Kurren as modified and adopted by the United States District Court in its decision filed September 4, 1992, we affirm the denial of Martinez's habeas corpus petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 F.3d 537, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30416, 1993 WL 318896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-martinez-v-harold-falk-ca9-1993.