Marshall Hondo Riley v. State
This text of Marshall Hondo Riley v. State (Marshall Hondo Riley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 17, 2020
No. 04-19-00744-CR
Marshall Hondo RILEY, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas Trial Court No. 18-10-166-CRW Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding
ORDER Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on January 13, 2020. The brief has not been filed. Appellant’s attorney is ORDERED to respond to this court in writing within ten (10) days of the date of this order stating a reasonable explanation for failing to timely file the brief and demonstrating the steps being taken to remedy the deficiency. If appellant’s attorney fails to file an adequate response within ten (10) days, this appeal will be abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing, and the trial court will be asked to consider whether sanctions are appropriate. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2).
_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of January, 2020.
___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marshall Hondo Riley v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-hondo-riley-v-state-texapp-2020.