Marshall Hondo Riley v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 17, 2020·No. 04-19-00744-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 17, 2020

No. 04-19-00744-CR

Marshall Hondo RILEY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas Trial Court No. 18-10-166-CRW Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on January 13, 2020. The brief has not been filed. Appellant’s attorney is ORDERED to respond to this court in writing within ten (10) days of the date of this order stating a reasonable explanation for failing to timely file the brief and demonstrating the steps being taken to remedy the deficiency. If appellant’s attorney fails to file an adequate response within ten (10) days, this appeal will be abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing, and the trial court will be asked to consider whether sanctions are appropriate. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2).

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of January, 2020.

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall Hondo Riley v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Marshall Hondo Riley v. State (Marshall Hondo Riley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.