Marshall (Bradley) v. State
This text of Marshall (Bradley) v. State (Marshall (Bradley) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
BRADLEY ANTWAN MARSHALL, No. 70453 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILE Respondent. AUG 2 2 2016
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This appeal was initiated by the filing of a pro se appeal. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge. On May 19, 2016, appellant filed a notice of appeal. No appealable order was designated in the notice of appeal. To the extent that appellant appeals from the June 9, 2016, order, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order denying motion, or in the alternative, countermotion to treat motion as a petition and transfer petition to the appropriate venue. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 362, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Because appellant failed to designate an appealable order, we lack jurisdiction and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
, C.J. Parraguirre
Pickering Piek.M. (AAP ,J.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
■0 ) 1941 A :a5 c 4° cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Bradley Antwan Marshall Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
(0) 1947A 2 • ,e,t-c=i'J-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marshall (Bradley) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-bradley-v-state-nev-2016.