Marsha Mathis v. the Kroger Co. and Kroger Texas L.P.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 21, 2023
Docket14-23-00665-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Marsha Mathis v. the Kroger Co. and Kroger Texas L.P. (Marsha Mathis v. the Kroger Co. and Kroger Texas L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marsha Mathis v. the Kroger Co. and Kroger Texas L.P., (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 21, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00665-CV

MARSHA MATHIS, Appellant

V.

THE KROGER CO. AND KROGER TEXAS L.P., Appellees

On Appeal from the 190th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2022-53523

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed August 8, 2023, in which the trial court rendered judgment for appellee Kroger Texas L.P. against appellant Marsha Mathis. By its terms, however, the judgment did not resolve claims raised by appellant against appellee The Kroger Co. As near as can be determined from the appellate record, those claims remain pending in the trial court proceeding. Accordingly, the judgment is interlocutory rather than final, and it is accordingly not appealable. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2001) (“A judgment that finally disposes of all remaining parties and claims, based on the record in the case, is final, regardless of its language.”). The appealed-from judgment also lacks any apparent basis for being immediately appealable. See CMH Homes v. Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 447 (Tex. 2011) (acknowledging the general rule that “interlocutory orders are not immediately appealable”).

On October 30, 2023, the parties were informed the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice for want of jurisdiction unless any party demonstrated by November 9, 2023 that this court had jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Neither party has filed a response.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Jewell.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CMH HOMES v. Perez
340 S.W.3d 444 (Texas Supreme Court, 2011)
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Marsha Mathis v. the Kroger Co. and Kroger Texas L.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsha-mathis-v-the-kroger-co-and-kroger-texas-lp-texapp-2023.