Marsha E. Rand v. Roger Eilert Rand
This text of Marsha E. Rand v. Roger Eilert Rand (Marsha E. Rand v. Roger Eilert Rand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
___________
No. 96-1881 ___________
Marsha E. Rand, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Southern District of Iowa. * Roger Eilert Rand; Connie * [UNPUBLISHED] Anderson, * * Appellees. *
Submitted: July 17, 1996
Filed: July 26, 1996 ___________
Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Marsha Rand appeals the district court's1 dismissal of her action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because her notice of appeal was not filed within the thirty-day time period provided by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1), we lack jurisdiction. See United States v. Vanornum, 912 F.2d 1023, 1025 (8th Cir. 1990). Accordingly, we dismiss. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
1 The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marsha E. Rand v. Roger Eilert Rand, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsha-e-rand-v-roger-eilert-rand-ca8-1996.