Marsh v. Vanness

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Marsh v. Vanness

74 A. 47, 75 N.J. Eq. 607, 5 Buchanan 607, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 304

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJune 14, 1909

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 74 A. 47 (Marsh v. Vanness) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marsh v. Vanness, 74 A. 47, 75 N.J. Eq. 607, 5 Buchanan 607, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 304 (N.J. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings of fact of the learned vice-chancellor, and upon that ground affirm this decree without considering the question of pleading involved. Costs were properly allowed the complainant, this being a foreclosure suit. P. L. 1902 p. 528 § 53.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, .Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Gray, Died—14. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings of fact of the learned vice-chancellor, and upon that ground affirm this decree without considering the question of pleading involved. Costs were properly allowed the complainant, this being a foreclosure suit. P. L. 1902 p. 528 § 53.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, .Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Gray, Died—14. For reversal—None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A. 47, 75 N.J. Eq. 607, 5 Buchanan 607, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsh-v-vanness-nj-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack