Marsh v. United States

96 Ct. Cl. 131, 1942 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 105, 1942 WL 4366
United States Court of Claims·Decided April 6, 1942·No. No. 45034·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[133] The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover, in an opinion

per curiam,

as follows:

The sole issue raised in this case has been decided by this court in the cases of James A. Greenwald v. United States, 88 C. Cls. 264; Charles G. Wadbrook v. United States, 90 C. Cls. 48; Henry M. Butler v. United States, 91 C. Cls. 88; and Warner U. Hines v. United States, decided December 1, 1941 (95 C. Cls. 156). Upon the decisions in those cases, plaintiff is entitled to recover. The claim, however, is a continuing one, and entry of judgment will be suspended pending receipt of a report from the General Accounting Office, showing the amount due plaintiff in accordance with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

In accordance with the above decision and upon a report from the General Accounting Office showing amount due thereunder, the court on November 2,1942, entered judgment, for the plaintiff in the sum of $372.92.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marsh v. United States, 96 Ct. Cl. 131, 1942 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 105, 1942 WL 4366 (cc 1942).

96 Ct. Cl. 131 (Marsh v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Almour v. Pace, Secretary of the Army
193 F.2d 699 (D.C. Circuit, 1951)