Marsh v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Marsh v. State

559 S.W.3d 113

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 16, 2018

DocketNo. ED 106030

StatusPublished

This text of 559 S.W.3d 113 (Marsh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marsh v. State, 559 S.W.3d 113 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Javon March appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Javon March appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 S.W.3d 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsh-v-state-moctapp-2018.