Marsh v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Marsh v. State

559 S.W.3d 113

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2018·No. No. ED 106030·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Javon March appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Javon March appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Marsh v. State, 559 S.W.3d 113 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

559 S.W.3d 113 (Marsh v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.