Marsh v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Marsh v. State

198 S.E. 555, 58 Ga. App. 393, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 276

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 9, 1938·No. 27071·Published

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

The evidence presented on behalf of the State and the defendant being conflicting, and thus presenting a. question solely for the determination of the jury, this court will not interfere. The evidence warranted the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Guerry, J., coneur. Price & Spivey, for plaintiff in error. W. H. Lanier, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, J.

The evidence presented on behalf of the State and the defendant being conflicting, and thus presenting a. question solely for the determination of the jury, this court will not interfere. The evidence warranted the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Guerry, J., coneur. Price & Spivey, for plaintiff in error. W. H. Lanier, solicitor-general, contra.

Marsh v. State, 198 S.E. 555, 58 Ga. App. 393, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 276 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

198 S.E. 555 (Marsh v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.