Marsh v. State

129 So. 925, 24 Ala. App. 664
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 24, 1930
Docket8 Div. 879.
StatusPublished

This text of 129 So. 925 (Marsh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marsh v. State, 129 So. 925, 24 Ala. App. 664 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This court en bane has read the entire record in this case, and are of the opinion that the reasonable probabilities of the innocence of this appellant are too numerous to permit his conviction to stand upon the evidence adduced upon the trial of this case in the court below. He was entitled to the affirmative charge, and, for the error in refusing same, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is reversed, and the cause remanded. This case is not unlike that of Mrs. Lena Talbot v. State, 23 Ala. App. 559, 129 So. 323. See, also, Hutcheson v. State, 21 Ala. App. 174, 106 So. 207; Williams v. State, 22 Ala. App. 425, 116 So. 413; Ammons v. State, 20 Ala. App. 283, 101 So. 511; Huckabaa v. State, 23 Ala. App. 333, 125 So. 203.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Talbot v. State
129 So. 323 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1930)
Huckabaa v. State
125 So. 202 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1929)
Hutcheson v. State
106 So. 206 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Williams v. State
116 So. 413 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1928)
Ammons v. State
101 So. 511 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Yielding v. State
125 So. 203 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 So. 925, 24 Ala. App. 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsh-v-state-alactapp-1930.