Marsh v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Marsh v. State

591 So. 2d 152, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 2635, 1991 WL 275046

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedNovember 15, 1991

DocketCR-90-1290

StatusPublished

This text of 591 So. 2d 152 (Marsh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marsh v. State, 591 So. 2d 152, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 2635, 1991 WL 275046 (Ala. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PATTERSON, Presiding Judge.

Leslie Mae Marsh, the appellant, pleaded guilty to three separate offenses of unlawful distribution of a controlled substance, violations of § 13A-12-211, Code of Alabama 1975. She was sentenced under § 13A-12-250 to seven years’ imprisonment in each case, and her sentences were ordered to be served concurrently with each other.

In its brief, the state presents a motion to remand this case to the circuit court for the appointment of new counsel. After considering the state’s motion, in conjunction with the trial transcript and with Marsh’s brief, we grant the motion, and hereby remand this case to the circuit court with instructions to appoint new appellate counsel for Marsh.

MOTION GRANTED; REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PATTERSON, Presiding Judge.

Leslie Mae Marsh, the appellant, pleaded guilty to three separate offenses of unlawful distribution of a controlled substance, violations of § 13A-12-211, Code of Alabama 1975. She was sentenced under § 13A-12-250 to seven years’ imprisonment in each case, and her sentences were ordered to be served concurrently with each other.

In its brief, the state presents a motion to remand this case to the circuit court for the appointment of new counsel. After considering the state’s motion, in conjunction with the trial transcript and with Marsh’s brief, we grant the motion, and hereby remand this case to the circuit court with instructions to appoint new appellate counsel for Marsh.

MOTION GRANTED; REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

591 So. 2d 152, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 2635, 1991 WL 275046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsh-v-state-alacrimapp-1991.