Marsh v. New Hampshire Fire Insurance

49 A. 88, 70 N.H. 590
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 49 A. 88 (Marsh v. New Hampshire Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marsh v. New Hampshire Fire Insurance, 49 A. 88, 70 N.H. 590 (N.H. 1900).

Opinion

Young, J.

The language of the policy, “ on frame mill building and all additions thereto adjoining and communicating . . . occupied by the assured as a pail shop,” was apt to describe the buildings occupied by the plaintiff in manufacturing pails, and commonly spoken of as his pail shop. “All additions” means more than a single addition. “ Adjoining ” describes the addition built on to the main building. “ Communicating ” describes the dry-house and the engine-house, for they communicate with the main building by means of the movable bridge. 2 Cent. Diet., communicate, int. The description included all additions which either adjoin or communicate with the frame mill building and were, occupied by the plaintiff for manufacturing pails. Consequently the policy covered both the engine-house and the dry-house.

Exception sustained: judgment for the plaintiff.

■Chase, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shepard v. Germania Fire Insurance
130 N.W. 626 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1911)
Ferguson v. Lumbermen's Insurance
88 P. 128 (Washington Supreme Court, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A. 88, 70 N.H. 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsh-v-new-hampshire-fire-insurance-nh-1900.