Marsh v. Myers

9 P.3d 113, 330 Or. 513, 2000 Ore. LEXIS 645
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 17, 2000
DocketSC S47724
StatusPublished

This text of 9 P.3d 113 (Marsh v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marsh v. Myers, 9 P.3d 113, 330 Or. 513, 2000 Ore. LEXIS 645 (Or. 2000).

Opinion

*515 PER CURIAM

This ballot title review proceeding brought under ORS 250.085(2) concerns the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for a proposed initiative measure, denominated by the Secretary of State as Initiative Petition 1 (2002). Petitioners are electors who timely submitted written comments to the Secretary of State concerning the content of the Attorney General’s draft ballot title and who therefore are entitled to seek review in this court. See ORS 250.085(2) (stating that requirement). We review the Attorney General’s certified ballot title to determine whether it “substantially complies” with the requirements of ORS 250.035(2)(a) to (d) (1999). 1 ORS 250.085(5).

Petitioners challenge the caption, “yes” result statement, and summary certified by the Attorney General. We have considered each argument advanced by petitioners and determine that none is well taken. Accordingly, we certify the following ballot title to the Secretary of State:

REPEALS THE “LEGISLATIVE STATUTORY SUPPLANTMENT” TO ARTICLE VII (AMENDED) OF THE OREGON CONSTITUTION
RESULT OF “YES” VOTE: “Yes” vote would repeal the “legislative statutory supplantment” to Article VII (Amended) of the Oregon Constitution.
RESULT OF “NO” VOTE: “No” vote would retain the current statutory scheme concerning the judges, juries, courts, jurisdiction, and judicial system in Oregon.
SUMMARY: Article VII (Amended) of the Oregon Constitution authorizes the Legislative Assembly to adopt statutes creating courts inferior to the Oregon Supreme Court; establishing the jurisdiction of Oregon’s courts; empowering the Oregon Supreme Court to appoint temporary judges to Oregon’s courts; setting judges’ salaries and retirement age; prescribing the record on appeals; governing juror *516 selection and qualifications; prescribing the form for indictments; establishing the punishment, in addition to dismissal from office, for incompetency, corruption, malfeasance, or delinquency in office; establishing the procedure for removing or suspending a judge from office; and providing for juries consisting of fewer than 12 but at least six jurors. The legislature has adopted such statutes. The measure would repeal the “legislative statutory supplantment” to Article VII (Amended) of the Oregon Constitution.

Ballot title certified. This decision shall become effective in accordance with ORAP 11.30(10).

1

The 1999 Legislature amended ORS 250.035(2) in several respects. Or Laws 1999, ch 793, § 1. This is the first case brought before this court to which the 1999 amendments apply.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 250.035
Oregon § 250.035(2)(a)
§ 250.085
Oregon § 250.085(2)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 P.3d 113, 330 Or. 513, 2000 Ore. LEXIS 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsh-v-myers-or-2000.