Marsh v. Marsh

67 So. 81, 68 Fla. 355
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 24, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 67 So. 81 (Marsh v. Marsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marsh v. Marsh, 67 So. 81, 68 Fla. 355 (Fla. 1914).

Opinion

Whitfield, J.

This appeal is from an order sustaining “Exceptions” taken to a bill of complaint. The bill seeks to vacate an order confirming a sale of lands made in a partition proceeding on the grounds of fraudulent conduct on the part of one of the parties to the suit for partition which resulted in a sale of the property at a grossly inadequate price far below its real value at the time.

The paragraphs of the bill of complaint that were expunged by sustaining the exceptions are not scandalous and it cannot be said that they are wholly immaterial or impertinent, since they give particulars of the fraudulent conduct on which the relief is sought. Without considering the propriety of the procedure in taking the “exceptions to the bill of complaint,” the order which in effect struck from the bill the designated matters set up as a basis for the relief sought is erroneous and is reversed.

[356]*356Shackleford, C. J., and Taylor, Cockrell and Hocker, J. 0., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marsh v. Marsh
72 So. 638 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 So. 81, 68 Fla. 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsh-v-marsh-fla-1914.