Marsh v. London
181 So. 2d 186, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3618
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 14, 1965
DocketNo. 65-340
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 181 So. 2d 186 (Marsh v. London) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Marsh v. London, 181 So. 2d 186, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3618 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).
Opinion
Affirmed upon authority of the law stated in Lopez v. Lopez, Fla.1956, 90 So.2d 456, at page 458, where, in speaking of the [187]*187purchase of property where title had been taken as an estate by the entirety, the Supreme Court said:
“We do not consider the purchase money mortgages and notes involved in this cause to be a common burden. We construe that the husband and wife were each obligated for the whole of the debt, since each is considered to have purchased and owned the whole estate. Their interests were not divisible. Ashwood v. Patterson, Fla. 1951, 49 So.2d 848.”
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Taber v. Taber
626 So. 2d 1089 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Marsh v. London
188 So. 2d 819 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
181 So. 2d 186, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsh-v-london-fladistctapp-1965.