Marsh v. Hendricks
This text of 3 N.J.L. 611 (Marsh v. Hendricks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
-This judgment must he reversed. The justice erred in giving judgment for any more costs than that of the prevailing party. The prevailing party had no right to recover the costs laid out and expended by his adversary. The judgment is not a judgment rendered for the justice, the officers of the court, or the witnesses, but for the party. The prevailing [*] party recovers a judgment for the costs which he himself has legally expended, in and about this suit; what his adversary hath expended he has his right to. Judgment reversed.
Taylor v. Sale. Judgment in this case was reversed this term, for the same cause.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 N.J.L. 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsh-v-hendricks-nj-1809.