Marsh v. Hall

217 Cal. 787
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 19, 1932
DocketS. F. No. 14833
StatusPublished

This text of 217 Cal. 787 (Marsh v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marsh v. Hall, 217 Cal. 787 (Cal. 1932).

Opinion

THE COURT.

The petition for a writ of mandate in the above-entitled matter is denied on the authority of Uhl v. Collins, (S. F. No. 14793) ante, p. 1 [17 Pac. (2d) 99], this day filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Uhl v. Collins
17 P.2d 99 (California Supreme Court, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 Cal. 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsh-v-hall-cal-1932.