Marsh v. Commissioner of Social Security
This text of Marsh v. Commissioner of Social Security (Marsh v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W ESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
ROBERT MARSH,
Plaintiff,
v. DECISION AND ORDER 18-CV-1302S COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
Plaintiff Robert Marsh is a prevailing party in this social security benefits action. Presently before this Court is Plaintiff’s counsel’s timely Motion for Attorney Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406 (b)(1)(A).1 (Docket No. 18.) Defendant does not oppose the motion. (Docket No. 19.) Forty-two U.S.C. § 406 (b)(1)(A) provides as follows: Whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant under this subchapter who was represented before the court by an attorney, the court may determine and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason of such judgment, and the Commissioner of Social Security may, notwithstanding the provisions of section 405(i) of this title, but subject to subsection (d) of this section, certify the amount of such fee for payment to such attorney out of, and not in addition to, the amount of such past-due benefits. In case of any such judgment, no other fee may be payable or certified for payment for such representation except as provided in this paragraph.
1 The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently clarified that § 406 (b) motions must be filed within 14 days after the claimant receives notice of the Commissioner’s favorable award on remand, consistent with Rule 54 (d)(2)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and equitable tolling principles. See Sinkler v. Berryhill, 932 F.3d 83, 86 (2d Cir. 2019). Plaintiff presumably received his notice of favorable award three days after its issue date of November 24, 2020, id. at n. 5, making Plaintiff’s counsel’s December 8, 2020 motion timely. Plaintiff was awarded past-due benefits by letter dated November 24, 2020. (Affidavit of William Bernhardi, Docket No. 18-1 at p. 3; Docket No. 18-5 at p. 2.) The Social Security Administration withheld 25% of Plaintiff’s benefits, or $24,244.00, in order to pay Plaintiff’s counsel. (Docket No. 18-5 at p. 2.) Plaintiff’s counsel now seeks $18,000
in attorney’s fees, consistent with the contingent-fee agreement that provides for attorney fees not to exceed 25% of any recovery. (Docket No. 18-8 at p. 1; see also Plaintiff’s “Petition Agreement,” Docket No. 18-2 at p. 1.) Having thoroughly reviewed counsel’s fee request and supporting documentation, this Court finds that the requested fee is reasonable based on counsel’s experience in social security law, the character of the representation provided, and the favorable results achieved. See Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 808, 1122 S. Ct. 1817, 152 L. Ed. 2d 996 (2002). Moreover, there is no indication that this fee is a windfall. Id. Plaintiff’s counsel’s $18,000 fee request is therefore granted under 42 U.S.C. § 406 (b)(1)(A). By stipulation approved and ordered on May 19, 2020, this Court previously
awarded Plaintiff’s counsel $5,500 in fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d). (Docket No. 17.) Because the fee granted herein exceeds the EAJA fee, Plaintiff’s counsel must refund the EAJA fee to Plaintiff. See Wells v. Bowen, 855 F.2d 37, 42 (2d Cir. 1988). Plaintiff’s counsel asserted in his affidavit that he was refunding to Plaintiff on December 8, 2020, the $400.00 award of costs counsel received. (Docket No. 18-8 at p. 3.)
2 IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that counsel’s Motion for Attorney Fees in the amount of $18,000 under 42 U.S.C. § 406 (b)(1)(A) (Docket No. 18) is GRANTED. FURTHER, that Plaintiff’s counsel is directed to refund to Plaintiff the $5,500.00 EAJA award within 14 days after receiving his § 406 (b) award.
FURTHER, that if the $400.00 award of costs has not yet been refunded to Plaintiff, it must be refunded within 14 days after Plaintiff’s counsel receives his § 406 (b) award. SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 5, 2021 Buffalo, New York
s/William M. Skretny WILLIAM M. SKRETNY United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marsh v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsh-v-commissioner-of-social-security-nywd-2021.