Marsh v. City of Brooklyn
This text of 9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 142 (Marsh v. City of Brooklyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is not disputed by the respondent but that the assessment in question is totally invalid, and it is only by proof aliv/nde that the invalidity is to" be established.
Equity, in such a case, will entertain a complaint, and remove the cloud on plaintiff’s title.
There is no finding of confirmation, but the answer admits that the assessment is now a lien on the premises described in the complaint.
The case, therefore, shows an existing lien which is, in fact, invalid.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Present — Barnard, P. J., Tappen and Talcott, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Crooke v. Andrews, 40 N. Y., 547; Scott v. Onderdonk, 14 id., 9.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsh-v-city-of-brooklyn-nysupct-1874.