Marsh v. Blythe

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Marsh v. Blythe

10 S.C.L. 170

DecidedJanuary 15, 1818

StatusPublished

This text of 10 S.C.L. 170 (Marsh v. Blythe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marsh v. Blythe, 10 S.C.L. 170 (S.C. 1818).

Pincite

Opinion

*The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Bichardson, Attorney-General, for the motion. Holmes and Gadsden, contra.

*Gantt, J.

The Court are of opinion, that the question was one of fact, which ought to have been left to the jury, to be declared by their verdict; and that as they were restricted by the charge of the Court, and confined within limits too prescribed, the verdict must be set aside, and a new trial granted. See Abbot on Shipping, Story’s Ed. from 252 to 260,

Coloook, Cheves, Nott and Johnson, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Bichardson, Attorney-General, for the motion. Holmes and Gadsden, contra.

*Gantt, J.

The Court are of opinion, that the question was one of fact, which ought to have been left to the jury, to be declared by their verdict; and that as they were restricted by the charge of the Court, and confined within limits too prescribed, the verdict must be set aside, and a new trial granted. See Abbot on Shipping, Story’s Ed. from 252 to 260,

Coloook, Cheves, Nott and Johnson, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 S.C.L. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsh-v-blythe-sc-1818.