Marsh v. Bergman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Marsh v. Bergman

84 N.Y.S. 469

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 6, 1903·Published

Opinion

BLANCHARD, J.

This is an action brought by an employe to recover damages for wrongful discharge from the service of his employer. The evidence upon the issues was conflicting, and was properly submitted to the jury. The defendant’s exceptions are without merit. The denial of the defendant’s motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence was proper.

Judgments and orders denying defendant’s motions for a new trial on the minutes and on the ground of newly discovered evidence should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLANCHARD, J.

This is an action brought by an employe to recover damages for wrongful discharge from the service of his employer. The evidence upon the issues was conflicting, and was properly submitted to the jury. The defendant’s exceptions are without merit. The denial of the defendant’s motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence was proper.

Judgments and orders denying defendant’s motions for a new trial on the minutes and on the ground of newly discovered evidence should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Marsh v. Bergman, 84 N.Y.S. 469 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

84 N.Y.S. 469 (Marsh v. Bergman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.