Marsh Capron Mfg. Co. v. Bates Machine & Tractor Co.

289 F. 633, 53 App. D.C. 235, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2023
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMay 7, 1923
DocketNo. 1569
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 289 F. 633 (Marsh Capron Mfg. Co. v. Bates Machine & Tractor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marsh Capron Mfg. Co. v. Bates Machine & Tractor Co., 289 F. 633, 53 App. D.C. 235, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2023 (D.C. Cir. 1923).

Opinion

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This is a trade-mark opposition, brought under section 6 of the Trade-Mark Act of February 20, 1905 (Comp. St. § 9491). It involves the right of appellant to register the words “The Shop Mule” as a trade-mark for tractors. From the decision of the Commissioner of Patents sustaining the opposition, this appeal was taken.

It appears that appellee, opposer, had continuously used, since long prior to any date claimed by applicant, the words “Steel Mule” as a trade-mark for tractors. Prior use by opposer is conceded by the applicant, but it is contended that the goods have not the.same descriptive properties. Opposer’s tractor is of the crawler type, used principally in agricultural work, while that of applicant is of the wheel type, and is used on hard surfaces in and about manufacturing plants and railroad depots.

It appears, however, that, while opposer specializes in tractors of the crawler type, they are not used exclusively in agricultural work, but .about excavating work and on the roads. It further appears that they [634]*634are frequently mounted on wheels, and that opposer manufactures steel tractors for use on soft surfaces.

We agree with the Commissioner that the marks are deceptively similar, and that the goods have the same descriptive properties. It follows that, inasmuch as opposer may legitimately extend his business to the manufacture of light wheel tractors, on which he would be entitled to use his mark, there is no theory upon which the contentions of applicant can be sustainéd.

The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 F. 633, 53 App. D.C. 235, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsh-capron-mfg-co-v-bates-machine-tractor-co-cadc-1923.