Marsh and Others v. Nichols and Others
This text of 120 U.S. 595 (Marsh and Others v. Nichols and Others) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
7 S.Ct. 704
30 L.Ed. 794
MARSH and others
v.
NICHOLS and others.1
March 14, 1887.
[Statement of Case from pages 595-597 intentionally omitted]
E. J. Hill, for the motion.
R. A. Parker and Don M. Dickinson, in opposition.
WAITE, C. J.
This motion is denied. The sole ground of the application is that since the appeal the supreme court of Michigan has, in a suit between the same parties, enjoined these appellants from making any claim against the appellee for the use of the patented invention which is the subject-matter of the suit, and has required them to release all the claims and demands which they have been prosecuting. Marsh and Le Fever oppose this motion, and Scott has no right to dismiss for them.
See 15 Fed. Rep. 914.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 U.S. 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsh-and-others-v-nichols-and-others-scotus-1887.