Marsel Peterson v. State of Florida
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
MARSEL PETERSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-0905
[June 25, 2025]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, Judge; L.T. Case No. 03-12651CF10B.
Marsel Peterson, Arcadia, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Wainwright v. State, No. SC2025-0708, 2025 WL 1561151 (Fla. June 3, 2025) (holding that, even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a change in law, it does not apply retroactively to cases that were final when it was decided).
KLINGENSMITH, C.J., WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marsel Peterson v. State of Florida (Marsel Peterson v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.