Marsden Electric Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
This text of 586 F.2d 8 (Marsden Electric Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Before EDWARDS and MERRITT, Circuit Judges, and LAWRENCE, * District Judge.
This case is before the Court upon the petition of Marsden Electric Co. to set aside the decision and order of the N.L.R.B. issued November 22, 1976, reported at 226 N.L.R.B. No. 176. The Board has filed a cross-application for enforcement of its order.
Reviewing the record as a whole, we find substantial evidence supporting the Board’s finding that the company violated § 8(a)(1) and (3) of the Act by threatening to close the plant if unionization occurred and by discharging two employees because of their union activities. On the other issue raised by the company concerning the refusal of the administrative law judge to *9 sequester a witness at the hearing, we con-elude that his action in refusing to exclude the witness from the hearing room did not constitute reversible error.
Accordingly, we decline to set aside or modify the order of the Board. The order is enforced.
The Honorable Alexander Lawrence. Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
586 F.2d 8, 100 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2314, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 7946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsden-electric-company-inc-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca6-1978.