Mars v. Perales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mars v. Perales

131 A.D.2d 674, 516 N.Y.S.2d 904, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48134

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 131 A.D.2d 674 (Mars v. Perales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mars v. Perales, 131 A.D.2d 674, 516 N.Y.S.2d 904, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, dated April 11, 1985, which, after a fair hearing, affirmed a determination of the local agency denying the petitioner’s application for medical assistance on behalf of Lee Falk.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The administrative determination that Lee Falk was not a resident of New York State during the period prior to her loss of capacity to form an intent to change her residence was neither arbitrary nor capricious and was supported by substantial evidence. Mangano, J. P., Niehoff, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, dated April 11, 1985, which, after a fair hearing, affirmed a determination of the local agency denying the petitioner’s application for medical assistance on behalf of Lee Falk.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The administrative determination that Lee Falk was not a resident of New York State during the period prior to her loss of capacity to form an intent to change her residence was neither arbitrary nor capricious and was supported by substantial evidence. Mangano, J. P., Niehoff, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 A.D.2d 674, 516 N.Y.S.2d 904, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mars-v-perales-nyappdiv-1987.