Home/New York Court of Appeals/Mars Associates, Inc. v. City of New York

Mars Associates, Inc. v. City of New York

420 N.E.2d 971, 53 N.Y.2d 627, 438 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2296
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 24, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 420 N.E.2d 971 (Mars Associates, Inc. v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mars Associates, Inc. v. City of New York, 420 N.E.2d 971, 53 N.Y.2d 627, 438 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2296 (N.Y. 1981).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment appealed from and-the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in that court’s memorandum.

In addition, we note that the circumstances of the waiver demonstrate as a matter of law that it was designed to cover the claim upon which plaintiff now sues. Plaintiff is a sophisticated contractor, and in withstanding the motion for summary judgment it did not show that the instant claim for delay damages was covered by the exceptions from the blanket waiver. Those exceptions covered “various change orders and work under protest”, and the parties have used these terms to refer to extra work beyond the original contract, not claims for damages by reason of acts or omissions of the city. If the exemptions were intended to be broader in scope, it was incumbent upon plaintiff to state its intentions with clarity.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Judgment appealed from and order of the Appellate Division brought up for review affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of LAWS Constr. Corp. v. Contract Dispute Resolution Bd.
2016 NY Slip Op 8326 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Martin Iron & Construction Corp. v. E.W. Howell Co.
242 A.D.2d 608 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Lintas: Campbell-Ewald Co. v. 525 Lexington Avenue Associates
179 A.D.2d 483 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Clifton Steel Corp. v. County of Monroe Public Works Department
120 A.D.2d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Albert Saggese, Inc. v. Town of Hempstead
100 A.D.2d 885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Herman H. Schwartz, Inc. v. City of New York
100 A.D.2d 610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New York
459 N.E.2d 164 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New York
89 A.D.2d 836 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Board of Higher Education v. Bass & D'Alessandro Enterprises, Inc.
85 A.D.2d 543 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
420 N.E.2d 971, 53 N.Y.2d 627, 438 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mars-associates-inc-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1981.