MARRUGO v. State

34 So. 3d 138, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5274, 2010 WL 1565215
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 21, 2010·No. 3D10-309·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This Court hereby affirms the trial court’s order denying Defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800, but does so without prejudice to the filing of an amended motion properly attaching the transcript of the sentencing proceedings in this matter. See Williams v. State, 957 So.2d 600, 604 (Fla.2007) (“[T]he burden remains with the petitioner to demonstrate an entitlement to relief on the face of the record. If the sentencing transcript is neither in the file nor attached to the motion, the motion should be denied without prejudice to the filing of an amended motion properly attaching the sentencing transcript”).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARRUGO v. State, 34 So. 3d 138, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5274, 2010 WL 1565215 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

34 So. 3d 138 (MARRUGO v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SYDER v. State
34 So. 3d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)