MARRUGO v. State
Opinion
This Court hereby affirms the trial court’s order denying Defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800, but does so without prejudice to the filing of an amended motion properly attaching the transcript of the sentencing proceedings in this matter. See Williams v. State, 957 So.2d 600, 604 (Fla.2007) (“[T]he burden remains with the petitioner to demonstrate an entitlement to relief on the face of the record. If the sentencing transcript is neither in the file nor attached to the motion, the motion should be denied without prejudice to the filing of an amended motion properly attaching the sentencing transcript”).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
34 So. 3d 138 (MARRUGO v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.