Marrs v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Marrs v. State

1924 OK CR 63, 223 P. 1117, 26 Okla. Crim. 243, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 76

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 1, 1924

DocketNo. A-4991.

StatusPublished

This text of 1924 OK CR 63 (Marrs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marrs v. State, 1924 OK CR 63, 223 P. 1117, 26 Okla. Crim. 243, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 76 (Okla. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment of conviction rendered against plaintiffs in error in the county court of Adair county on the 16th day of November, 1923, wherein eaeh of these plaintiffs in error was convicted of the offense of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquor, and punishment of each fixed as above stated. The appeal was not lodged in this court until the 18th day of January, 1924, 63 days after the rendition of judgment. No order was made by the trial court extending the time for lodging the appeal in this court beyond the 60-day period after rendition of judgment allowed by statute (section 2808, Compiled Statutes 1921), in misdemeanor cases. On the 5th day of February the Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the appeal was not filed in this court within the time required by law. No response has been made *244 to tbe same. An examination of, tbe record discloses that tbe motion of tbe Attorney General to dismiss tbe appeal is well taken, and the. appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment of conviction rendered against plaintiffs in error in the county court of Adair county on the 16th day of November, 1923, wherein eaeh of these plaintiffs in error was convicted of the offense of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquor, and punishment of each fixed as above stated. The appeal was not lodged in this court until the 18th day of January, 1924, 63 days after the rendition of judgment. No order was made by the trial court extending the time for lodging the appeal in this court beyond the 60-day period after rendition of judgment allowed by statute (section 2808, Compiled Statutes 1921), in misdemeanor cases. On the 5th day of February the Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the appeal was not filed in this court within the time required by law. No response has been made *244 to tbe same. An examination of, tbe record discloses that tbe motion of tbe Attorney General to dismiss tbe appeal is well taken, and the. appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1924 OK CR 63, 223 P. 1117, 26 Okla. Crim. 243, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marrs-v-state-oklacrimapp-1924.