Marroquin v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Marroquin v. State

186 S.W.3d 236, 358 Ark. 136

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJune 17, 2004

DocketCR 04-615

StatusPublished

This text of 186 S.W.3d 236 (Marroquin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marroquin v. State, 186 S.W.3d 236, 358 Ark. 136 (Ark. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant German Marroquin, through his attorney, Craig Lambert, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Mr. Lambert admits responsibility for failing to timely file the record in this case.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) {per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant German Marroquin, through his attorney, Craig Lambert, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Mr. Lambert admits responsibility for failing to timely file the record in this case.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) {per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 S.W.3d 236, 358 Ark. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marroquin-v-state-ark-2004.