Marroquin v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Marroquin v. State

186 S.W.3d 236, 358 Ark. 136

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided June 17, 2004·No. CR 04-615·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant German Marroquin, through his attorney, Craig Lambert, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Mr. Lambert admits responsibility for failing to timely file the record in this case.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) {per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant German Marroquin, through his attorney, Craig Lambert, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Mr. Lambert admits responsibility for failing to timely file the record in this case.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) {per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Marroquin v. State, 186 S.W.3d 236, 358 Ark. 136 (Ark. 2004).

Pincite

186 S.W.3d 236 (Marroquin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.