Marrone v. Di Castro

New York County Courts

Marrone v. Di Castro

18 Misc. 2d 705, 189 N.Y.S.2d 772, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3153

DecidedAugust 17, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Misc. 2d 705 (Marrone v. Di Castro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York County Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marrone v. Di Castro, 18 Misc. 2d 705, 189 N.Y.S.2d 772, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3153 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

John J. Walsh, J.

The motion is in all respects denied. The complaint in essence alleges that plaintiff was assaulted by a patron of defendant’s tavern on May 2, 1958 at Sylvan Beach, New York, and that the assailant was intoxicated and “was under the influence of intoxicating liquors which the defendant unlawfully served to said person ” as set forth therein.

The complaint appears to be in usual form and based upon section 16 of the Civil Rights Law and subdivision 2 of section 65 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. Since on this type of motion, all of the allegations of the complaint are deemed admitted for the purposes of the motion and no affidavits or other supporting papers can be used or relied upon by the defendant for the purposes of dismissing the complaint on this motion, the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Since section 16 of the Civil Rights Law specifically states that in any action such person shall have a right to recover actual and exemplary damages the motion must be denied. {Kinney v. 1809 Forest Ave., 7 Misc 2d 1.)

Motion denied, with $10 costs to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John J. Walsh, J.

The motion is in all respects denied. The complaint in essence alleges that plaintiff was assaulted by a patron of defendant’s tavern on May 2, 1958 at Sylvan Beach, New York, and that the assailant was intoxicated and “was under the influence of intoxicating liquors which the defendant unlawfully served to said person ” as set forth therein.

The complaint appears to be in usual form and based upon section 16 of the Civil Rights Law and subdivision 2 of section 65 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. Since on this type of motion, all of the allegations of the complaint are deemed admitted for the purposes of the motion and no affidavits or other supporting papers can be used or relied upon by the defendant for the purposes of dismissing the complaint on this motion, the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Since section 16 of the Civil Rights Law specifically states that in any action such person shall have a right to recover actual and exemplary damages the motion must be denied. {Kinney v. 1809 Forest Ave., 7 Misc 2d 1.)

Motion denied, with $10 costs to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Misc. 2d 705, 189 N.Y.S.2d 772, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marrone-v-di-castro-nycountyct-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack